Science Studies Colloquium

The Science Studies Colloquium is a series of monthly meetings where scholars interested in scientometrics, science of science, sociology of science and related areas present their work to each other in a virtual setting. Each colloquium is one hour, with approximately 30 minutes presentation and 30 minutes discussion. If you are interested in joining the colloquium as audience, you can use this link:

If you are a scholar and would like to present your work, send an e-mail with the suggested topic and a brief outline of the contents to Jens Peter Andersen Jens Peter Andersen <jpa@ps.au.dk>

Past presentations can be found below the current schedule, or on our YouTube channel (link opens in another window).

Use Zoom link: https://aarhusuniversity.zoom.us/j/64976305015

Newsletter

Would you like to receive a monthly reminder about the colloquium? Please sign up for our newsletter. We will only send a monthly reminder, approximately a week before the next meeting, or if there are changes to the programme.

Easy time conversion and calendar events

Click the links containing the time and date of a presentation, and you will be directed to timeanddate.com, where you can easily see the event time in your local time zone and import it to your calendar.


Schedule


Photo of Jennifer Byrne
Jennifer Byrne

Paper mills and the preclinical research ecosystem

Wednesday, July 06 2022, 14:00 CEST (+0200)

Photo of Roberta Sinatra
Roberta Sinatra

Title to be announced

Wednesday, November 02 2022, 15:00 CET (+0100)

Photo of Barbara Lancho Barrantes
Barbara Lancho Barrantes

Predatory publishing threatens research integrity: bibliometrics as key actor in the detection

Wednesday, December 07 2022, 15:00 CET (+0100)


Past presentations


Photo of Marek Kwiek
Marek Kwiek

Man-Woman Collaboration and Academic Careers: a Study of 25,000 University Professors

Wednesday, April 13 2022, 15:00 CEST (+0200)
Recorded presentation

We examined male-female collaboration practices of all internationally visible (25,000) Polish university professors based on their 160,000 Scopus-indexed publications. We merged a national registry of 100,000 scientists (with full administrative and biographical data) with the Scopus publication database. We examined the propensity to conduct same-sex collaboration across male-dominated, female-dominated, and gender-balanced disciplines. Across all age-groups and all academic positions, the majority of male scientists collaborate solely with men. The majority of female scientists, in contrast, do not collaborate with women at all. The gender homophily principle (i.e. collaborating predominantly with scientists of the same sex) works powerfully for male scientists – but does not seem to work for female scientists. We examined the propensity to engage in same-sex collaboration across several new dimensions. This research goes beyond traditional bibliometric studies of gender-based homophily in research collaboration by combining the data routinely inaccessible to large-scale studies (such as the biological age of all scientists, and the stages of their academic careers) and the data routinely accessible in bibliometric studies, such as journal prestige, academic disciplines, and institutional type. We discuss practical implications of our research for academic careers.

Photo of Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé, and Alexander MagazinovPhoto of Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé, and Alexander MagazinovPhoto of Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé, and Alexander Magazinov
Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé, and Alexander Magazinov

Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals

Wednesday, March 09 2022, 15:00 CET (+0100)
Recorded presentation


Photo of Stefanie Haustein
Stefanie Haustein

How can we reduce the misuse of metrics in academia?

Wednesday, February 09 2022, 15:00 CET (+0100)
Presentation slides | Recorded presentation

The quantification and oversimplification of academic success is harming scholarly communities in all disciplines. Scholarly metrics, such as the h-index or impact factor, are widely applied in academic tenure and funding decisions, but often inappropriately. This has created publication pressure, leading to a range of adverse effects and even scientific misconduct. To improve the understanding and appropriate use of scholarly metrics, the concept of metrics literacies has been proposed as an integrated set of competencies, dispositions, and knowledge that empower individuals to recognize, interpret, critically assess, and effectively and ethically use scholarly metrics. Attempts to address the lack of metrics literacies in the wider academic community, such as the Leiden Manifesto and The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) or books such as Becoming Metric-Wise: A Bibliometric Guide for Researchers and Measuring Research are published as textual documents. As scholars are already overwhelmed by too much to read, the question arises why not to provide more efficient and effective multimedia open educational resources (OERs) instead of text? The Metrics Literacies project aims to aims to educate researchers and research administrators by developing, testing and disseminating educational videos to reduce the misuse of metrics in academia.

Photo of Björn Hammarfelt
Björn Hammarfelt

Assessing academic careers: Metrics and trajectories in the evaluation of professorial candidates

Wednesday, January 12 2022, 15:00 CET (+0100)
Recorded presentation

Reputation and recognition gained through publications has been a crucial merit for career advancement in science since the birth of the research university in the late 18th century. The ability to publish research is instrumental both for gaining recognition within a specific field of research, and for the possibility of getting a permanent position in academia. Through a content analysis of assessment reports for professorial candidates in biomedicine, economics and history this presentation discusses how publication oeuvres are compared and evaluated. Specifically the analysis focus on how referees use bibliometric measures and other types of 'judgment devices' to assess and rank candidates. Moreover, specific attention is given to how evaluators mobilize the idea of 'career trajectories' to weave together disparate bits of evidence extracted from the bylines of researchers' CVs.

Photo of Diego Kozlowski
Diego Kozlowski

Intersectional inequalities in science

Monday, December 06 2021, 15:00 CET (+0100)
Recorded presentation


Photo of Anna Abalkina
Anna Abalkina

The proliferation of hijacked journals: detection and academic misconduct

Wednesday, November 10 2021, 15:00 CET (+0100)
Recorded presentation

The presentation will discuss two issues of hijacked journals. The first shows how cost-reduction strategies of hijacked journals expansion allow to detect these fraudulent publishers. The second issue is connected with the belief in the literature that naïve authors submit papers to hijacked journals. The presentation will demonstrate that there is a group of dishonest authors who are attracted by the fast publication with no peer review process that is offered by hijacked journals.

Photo of Vincent Larivière
Vincent Larivière

Are self-citations a normal feature of knowledge accumulation or a perversion of research evaluation?

Wednesday, October 13 2021, 15:00 CEST (+0200)
Recorded presentation